In vivo evaluation of inter-operator reproducibility of digital dental and conventional impression techniques.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the inter-operator reproducibility of three-dimensional (3D) images of teeth captured by a digital impression technique to a conventional impression technique in vivo. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve participants with complete natural dentition were included in this study. A digital impression of the mandibular molars of these participants was made by two operators with different levels of clinical experience, 3 or 16 years, using an intra-oral scanner (Lava COS, 3M ESPE). A silicone impression also was made by the same operators using the double mix impression technique (Imprint3, 3M ESPE). Stereolithography (STL) data were directly exported from the Lava COS system, while STL data of a plaster model made from silicone impression were captured by a three-dimensional (3D) laboratory scanner (D810, 3shape). The STL datasets recorded by two different operators were compared using 3D evaluation software and superimposed using the best-fit-algorithm method (least-squares method, PolyWorks, InnovMetric Software) for each impression technique. Inter-operator reproducibility as evaluated by average discrepancies of corresponding 3D data was compared between the two techniques (Wilcoxon signed-rank test). RESULTS: The visual inspection of superimposed datasets revealed that discrepancies between repeated digital impression were smaller than observed with silicone impression. Confirmation was forthcoming from statistical analysis revealing significantly smaller average inter-operator reproducibility using a digital impression technique (0.014± 0.02 mm) than when using a conventional impression technique (0.023 ± 0.01 mm). CONCLUSION: The results of this in vivo study suggest that inter-operator reproducibility with a digital impression technique may be better than that of a conventional impression technique and is independent of the clinical experience of the operator.

A 3-year follow-up of ceria-stabilized zirconia/alumina nanocomposite (Ce-TZP/A) frameworks for fixed dental prostheses.

PURPOSE: Zirconia/alumina nanocomposite stabilized with cerium oxide (Ce-TZP/A) shows significantly higher mechanical strength than yttrium-oxide-partially-stabilized zirconia (Y-TZP) and allows post-sintered machining that does not require any subsequent treatment. The aim of this prospective study was to assess the clinical performance of veneered Ce-TZP/A frameworks for fixed dental prostheses. METHODS: Fifteen patients with 22 Ce-TZP/A fixed prostheses were included in this study. The fixed dental prostheses were cemented with resin cement (baseline) and were evaluated at baseline and at 1, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months after cementation. Clinical events, including fracture and loss of retention, secondary caries, and marginal integrity, were recorded. The biologic outcome was judged by comparing the pre-treatment and post-treatment bleeding on probing (BOP), and probing pocket depth (PPD) of the abutment teeth. Radiographic examination was also performed at 12, 24 and 36 months. RESULTS: The mean observation period was 35.9±5.5 months. During this period, one abutment tooth was extracted due to root fracture and the survival rate was 95.2%. No significant change in BOP, PPD, and radiographic image was found during the 36-month follow-up period. CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this study, Ce-TZP/A was found to provide sufficient stability as a framework material in all regions. Special attention, however, must be paid to designing framework that provides sufficient support for the veneer. Furthermore, studies with longer observation periods and more patients are needed.